Comments on: Simplicity http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: blog on blog » Blog Archive » Simplicity http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-38165 blog on blog » Blog Archive » Simplicity Fri, 18 May 2007 20:49:11 +0000 http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/#comment-38165 [...] Simplicity: “ [...] [...] Simplicity: “ [...]

]]> By: TomC http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-9407 TomC Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:59:28 +0000 http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/#comment-9407 Pity those of us with dashes in domain names ;) Glad to see the redirect is up - phew! Pity those of us with dashes in domain names ;)

Glad to see the redirect is up – phew!

]]> By: Daniel http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-9245 Daniel Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:12:50 +0000 http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/#comment-9245 Indeed, you make an excellent point. But I just could not stand to look at those little dashes anymore! I do intend to set-up a nice automatic redirect. . . just living on the edge for the moment! (update: old urls redirect to new ones, hooray!) Indeed, you make an excellent point. But I just could not stand to look at those little dashes anymore! I do intend to set-up a nice automatic redirect. . . just living on the edge for the moment! (update: old urls redirect to new ones, hooray!)

]]> By: Michal Migurski http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-9219 Michal Migurski Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:03:33 +0000 http://www.shiffman.net/2007/01/16/simplicity/#comment-9219 You're intentionally stripping your URLs of meaning and breaking links without providing a <a href="http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.2" rel="nofollow">301</a>, just because of John Maeda? Even he says "be careful of what you remove." =) You’re intentionally stripping your URLs of meaning and breaking links without providing a 301, just because of John Maeda? Even he says “be careful of what you remove.” =)

]]>